Dull. Tedious. Contrived. My 10 Least Favourite Booker Prize Winners
Having decided on my list of 10 favourite Booker Prize winning novels, it’s time to reveal the 10 books that were the least interesting, enjoyable or memorable.
The first four are easy – they are the titles that were so lacking in appeal that I couldn’t even finish reading them. The remaining six are books that either I struggled to complete or I read to the end but wondered why I bothered.
The Famished Road
This was a book so bad that I couldn’t get beyond page 80. The style of the opening paragraph was a warning sign that this book would be a challenge:
In the beginning there was a river. The river became a road and the road branched out to the whole world. And because the road was once a river it was always hungry.
In my review of The Famished Road I commented that this paragraph read like a poor pastiche of the opening of Genesis. The book went on to introduce elements of magical realism – a style I struggle with but can read if it’s well done. Such was not the case with this book however.
Okri main character is an abiku or spirit child who lives in an unnamed city which most likely is from his home country of Nigeria. It’s a book that reflects on the country’s post-colonial experience.
The book has been called a landmark text for its use of a particular kind of African magical realism. The African traditions it describes would have made the book interesting but the text was so over-blown and confusing, I lost all patience.
- Won Booker Prize in 1991
- Other view/s
Personally, I’m amazed that the judges even finished the thing, let alone decided to give it the prize.Sam Jordison, The Guardian
Okri’s tale is a beautifully rendered allegory, enriched by its African setting, of love powerful enough to defy even death and his minions.Kirkus Reviews
A History of Seven Killings
This book relates the story of the attempted assassination of Bob Marley (never referred to by name, only as “the singer”) and its aftermath. I knew it was written partly in Jamaican patois but once I ‘tuned in” that didn’t present a problem.
The real difficulty was that it has a vast array of characters – the cast list at the beginning shows 75 names. Around a dozen of these jump in to tell their story. One is an American journalist, another is a kid called Bam Bam who saw his father shot in the head. There are several gangsters and a prostitute.
Since their appearances are often short, I kept forgetting who they all were. That plus the non linear narrative made the whole book far too confusing. I gave up after about 120 pages.
- Won Booker Prize in 2015
- Other view/s
It would be a challenge to keep faith with so many tumultuously occupied characters even if they were not being systematically divested of sympathetic qualities; as it is, the negativity becomes a slog.Hannah McGill, The independent
It’s like a Tarantino remake of “The Harder They Come”, but with a soundtrack by Bob Marley and a script by Oliver Stone and William Faulkner…epic in every sense of that word: sweeping, mythic, over-the-top, colossal and dizzyingly complex.’New York Times
This book is startling in its range of voices and registers, running from the patois of the street posse to The Book of Revelation. It is a representation of political times and places, from the CIA intervention in Jamaica to the early years of crack gangs in New York and Miami.Michael Wood, Chair of Booker Prize judges
The Finkler Question
What a dreary book this turned out to be. So dreary I gave up on it around the 150 page mark.
The narrative revolves around Julian Treslove, a man who once worked on the kind of BBC Radio 3 programmes that attract only the dedicated few listeners. When his star faded he began working as a celebrity lookalike.
Treslove has an identity problem. He wants to be a Jew so that he can experience the sense of belonging possessed by his two closest friends who are Jewish. In essence the novel deals with his obsession with the meaning of Jewishness, politically, socially, culturally etc.
This is a novel which has one idea and constantly nibbles away at it without ever getting any further forward. I was desperate for something – anything – to happen but gave up the hope that it ever would.
- Won Booker Prize in 2010
- Other view/s
… full of wit, warmth, intelligence, human feeling and understanding. It is also beautifully written with that sophisticated and near invisible skill of the authentic writer.Edward Docx, The Guardian
… very funny, of course, but also very clever, very sad and very subtle.Chair of judges, Sir Andrew Motion
I had never heard of this book when I started to read it in 2018. It’s probably one of the lesser-known Booker Prize winners. It will remain an unknown to me since I found I disliked it so much I simply could not get far into the narrative.
Set in pre-First World War Europe, the novel follows the escapades of G, an offspring of an Italian merchant. Essentially he’s a Cassanova type figure whose sexual liaisons and ‘conquests’ we are meant to find interesting.
They were not. The Kirkus reviewer (see quote below) seemed to suggest that this is my fault because I am a “common reader” unable to appreciate the subtleties of the book. Sounds a bit of a harsh judgement, and bordering on elitism.
- Won Booker Prize in 1972
- Other view/s
Ultimately (and ignoring the common reader whom it will defeat) it is an arresting, inordinately vital, impersonal, and remarkable work.Kirkus Review
… if you can tolerate ambiguity and a haphazard structure there is much to enjoy in G.Lisa, ANZLitLovers
I’m probably wading into controversial waters by including Salman Rushdie’s novel in my list of least favourite Booker Prize winners. It not only won the prize in 1981, it was named the “Booker of Bookers” in 1993 to mark the 25th anniversary of the prize and again in 2003 for the 40th anniversary.
The book falls into the category for me of books that I admire but do not enjoy. There was a huge amount to admire – the ingenuity of a central character with special powers born on the stroke of midnight, at the exact moment that the newly independent state of India is born. Then there’s the scale – more than 60 years in the turbulent history of India and Pakistan. And lastly, the blend of styles, comedy with history; Christian with Islamic and Hindu references and almost an encylopaedia’s worth of facts.
It was overpowering at times and I kept losing track of where I was in the narrative.
Maybe at a different time this novel would have gelled more with me. It certainly has a large fan club since it twice topped the public poll in those Booker of Booker award.
- Won the Booker Prize in 1981
- Other view/s
… conveyed in Indian English prose that pulsates between the tumultuous and the fantastic. A page of Rushdie is a rich, jewel-encrusted tapestry of allusions, puns, in-jokes, asides, and the unconsidered trifles of popular culture.
… we can celebrate Midnight’s Children as an English novel: a brilliant and endearing one, the latest of India’s many contributions to English fiction, and the most remarkable of them all.London Review of Books
My review of Saville described it as a “jaw-droppingly tedious tale” that I was glad to finish.
The premise for the novel sounded promising: it’s a tale of a boy who tries to rise above his roots in a South Yorkshire mining community. It being 1930s Britain the most pressing consideration is how to keep his parents and brothers above the poverty line. Plenty of subject matter for a hard hitting novel but instead the potential was lost by over-written scenes, mediocre dialogue and scrappy characterisation.
- Won Booker Prize in 1976
- Other view/s
His [Saville’s father] speech may be weighed down by unconvincing Yorkshire-isms, but Storey is still able to show us his heart. In short, he writes wonderfully far more often than he writes badly.The Guardian
The Line Of Beauty
To reach the end of The Line of Beauty you have to read a lot about sex, drugs and champagne- fuelled parties.
It’s a novel set in Britain in the 1980s; the era of Margaret Thatcher, economic euphoria and ultra confidence among the privileged governing classes. This is also the decade that saw the emergence of the Aids/HIV crisis.
Into this world steps Nick Guest, a young homosexual who comes from a middle class background. He moves into the house of an up and coming MP, giving him the ability to mingle with aristocrats and politicians. It’s not all hedonistic fun however, this is the period when HIV/AIDS began to make its presence felt.
The first half of the novel rambles along through a series of country house parties and assignations with sexual partners in parks. It wasn’t until the second half when Nick’s ex lover is diagnosed as HIV positive, that it perked up. But it was too little, too late.
- Won Booker Prize in 2004
- Other view/s
… brilliant recreation of that bigoted, nepotistic, racist, callous and mean-spirited epoch …The Independent
If Nick’s aesthetic detachment occasionally seems to reduce the novel’s emotional stakes, it nonetheless fuels Hollinghurst’s sumptuous writing and his bravura evocation of an entire era.The New Yorker
An indication of how little an impression this book made upon me, is that I remember absolutely nothing about the plot. All I recall is that it features a set of characters who live in houseboats on The Thames. I have a vague feeling that at some point there is a fire on board one of these dwellings. I loved the cover artwork of the edition I had but the contents left me underwhelmed.
- Winner of Booker Prize in 1979
- Other view/s
Fitzgerald is adept at evoking the atmosphere of late 1960s London with rich period detail but beyond this the book feels slight and inconclusive, meandering along with only the sketchiest plot.The Guardian
One of most impressive things about Offshore stems from Fitzgerald’s ability to treat her characters with sympathy despite their failings.Jacqui: JacquiWine’s Journal
The only book by an author from Wales to have won the Booker Prize, The Elected Member is a book that began well.
Its focus is on a seemingly respectable Jewish family whose beloved son succumbs to the effects of drug addiction. There is one particularly memorable scene where he suffers delusions caused by withdrawal from the drugs and imagines there are silver creatures climbing all over his bedroom.
If the book had maintained the same quality it would not be on my list of least favourite Booker Prize winners. Unfortunately the novel went down hill and ended in a far too neat conclusion. .
- Won Booker Prize in 1970
- Other view/s
The Elected Member is a worthy winner and a brave choice for the Booker prize, but not a masterpiece. It’s probably best summed up by the author herself, and her typically terse assessment of her own writing: “Better than most, not as good as some.The Guardian
Something To Answer For
P H Newby
This was the first book to win a Booker Prize. It was up against strong competition from Iris Murdoch (The Nice and the Good) and Muriel Spark (The Public Image). I find it interesting that both those contenders are authors who are still being read today but the winner remains largely unknown.
It’s a very odd book because you don’t really know whether what you are reading can be trusted. We can say with certainty that it’s set in Port Said, a city in the throes of the Suez Crisis. But even the main character doesn’t know what’s happening to him when he travels there to attend a funeral. He’s not even sure he knows his true name.
Beyond some episodes. of black humour, I didn’t find much in this novel to keep me entertained.
- Winner of Booker Prize in 1969
- Other view/s
It’s beautifully written, shot through with crisp, mordant wit, and Newby plays out his narrative with consummate skill to ensure it baffles and intrigues, leaving the readers hooked and thrashing about for meaning, desperate for him to reel things in.The Guardian
37 thoughts on “Dull. Tedious. Contrived. My 10 Least Favourite Booker Prize Winners”
I’m not surprised to see The Line of Beauty and The Finkler Question on here. I hated the latter and the first was a trek, but I was more familiar with his style and how he rambles in his writing in general.
Line of Beauty wasn’t good at all but at least I could get through it.
I gave up on The Finkler Question too – it was one of those books that was described as funny and I really couldn’t work out why. I love Penelope Fitzgerald, but Offshore is quite far down my list of her books – and you definitely have to connect with her writing style, which I didn’t do until my second book of hers.
“though I finished it, it didn’t make me want to rush out and try something else by [Rushdie]”
Amen. I finished it too, but that was the last Rushdie I will spend any time at all on.
I think I’m of the same mind when there are so many other authors I think I will enjoy more
Reading The Famished Road was a real challenge and it has forever changed the way that I read. Until that point, it had never even occurred to me (raised to read a homogeneous group of authors mostly dedicated to variations on a single shape and style of narrative) that there were different ways of telling stories depending on one’s perspective on, and experience of, the world. I’d only started reading the Booker Prize winners the previous year, with Possession–which I absolutely adored, and it was such a stark contrast that I wasn’t sure what to make of it, but I wanted to know more.
Although I agree with the “life is short” approach of several commenters above, my personal response to that brevity is to try to read a greater variety; if life is short, why simply reread the same kind of story endlessly? And the rest of my response is to try to read faster, always faster. 😀
I’m with you on the benefits of broadening the variety of reading material. It’s why I embarked on a World of Literature project, aiming to read books by authors from 50 different countries. Quite a few of them have been from Africa so I got to know the completely different way of telling a story. Some of course were more interesting that others but i did learn a lot about other cultures…
I couldn’t agree more about Finkler; defeated me too. And the Marlon James: I think I scanned page 1 and firmly slammed it shut. I don’t enjoy books written in patois, so not for me. I read the Rushdie many years ago – probably at its launch time, and recall enjoying it.
Patois can be challenging I agree. I got on ok with it but it was the story itself that I struggled with
HA! Yes! Sometimes the emperor really does have no clothes, good on you 😉
I find there are many Emperors without clothes among the prize winners……
Other than the Rushdie, I’m not familiar with any of these titles, which is…perhaps a good thing considering the topic of your post LOL
I can save you wasting some of your time 🙂
thank you! always appreciated 😉
The only one I’ve read here is Offshore. And I loved it!
Snap on Seven Killings and Finkler – I got a quarter of the way through both before giving up. I found both impenetrable and I’m not a reader who gives up easily…
I have Line of Beauty somewhere in the stack (but it’s been there for years, so no danger of it being read anytime soon!).
LOL! We can’t like everything, can we? The only one of these I’m likely to read is the Berger – I’ve only read one of his fiction titles and liked it very much, though this sounds a little bit more demanding…
I’v e read only one of those – The Finkler Question. My review at Goodreads begins: “Howard Jacbson’s eleventh novel is a major prize winner because of the quality of the writing. But does it provide a satisfactory experience for the reader?” If you care to, you can see it in full here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/483688213?book_show_action=false&from_review_page=1
I was mystified by the acclaim for The Line of Beauty which read like a soap opera to me and, like you, gave up The Finkler Question although probably more like 50 pages in.
I’ve never managed to finish Midnight’s Children despite having had three goes at it, so you’re not alone where that is concerned. However I love Offshore. Perhaps it helps to know something of the circumstances under which it was written, like most of Fitzgerald’s early work it’s very autobiographical, but I just love the quality of the writing.
It may also have something to do with my mood at the time that I didn’t enjoy Offshore.
The years 2005-07 produced such boring Booker winners that they turned me off the awards: The Sea by John Banville (2005), Kiran Desai’s The Inheritence of Loss (2006), and The Gathering by Anne Enright (2007). However, even they pale in comparison to The Old Devils by Kingsley Amis (1986). And to think it defeated Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale!
That’s funny – I enjoyed two of the books you didn’t like. The Sea and The Gathering 🙂 It’s very odd isn’t it that Amis was judged more favourably than Handmaid’s tale when you think which of these has stood the test of time. It would actually be interesting to go through all the years and see where the books that were not chosen, have proved more long lasting than the actual winner
It would actually be interesting to go through all the years and see where the books that were not chosen, have proved more long lasting than the actual winner.
Well, you are the most suitable person to take up such a project.😀
I totally agree with you on “The Finkler Question”, but not about “Midnight’s Children” or “Offshore”. I remember being quite impressed with Bernice Rubens but don’t believe I’ve read “Elected Member”. I haven’t read the others, except perhaps ‘G’, and I can’t remember my reaction. Good list. .
I know there are many people who rated Offshore more highly than I did. I may well read it again at some point just to see if my reaction was governed by the mood in which I was in first time around. That does affect my reactions often
How Late it Was, How Late was awful as well didn’t you think? Not much to argue with this list otherwise.
That was a difficult one to like – I got over the dialect issue fairly quickly but couldn’t really see where the plot was heading
Pun intended? (Main character was blind)
Heck no! I’m not that clever 😂
The Famished Road has been a TBR for me for a long time. Have never managed it and probably won’t now. Too little time to read all the books you really want to read without the struggle. I have enjoyed Rushdie and Midnights Children was the first I ever read. Again, these day I know when to give up. Thank you for this list and thank you for sharing the whole Reading the Booker experience.
Nothing will induce me to give The Famished Road a second attempt 🙂
My book club is reading Midnight’s Children by Salman Rushdie and even though I have had extra time to read this book, I still am not even halfway through it. It’s taking forever to get to the main tale and honestly I have a thousand other books I can’t wait to get to. Everyone raves about this book but so far I don’t see why and I have all but given up.
I think I almost gave up about three times on that book. Like you I find it frustrating to push on with a book I am not enjoying when I have so many others I know I will enjoy more – hence these days I am more inclined to abandon a book unfinished.
I couldn’t understand Midnight’s children. It was a horrible reading experience. Every time I’ve had to read Rushdie it’s been a horrible experience and I never finish. Clearly he isn’t for me. I probably won’t stop trying though.
Everyone raves about this book and I don’t understand why. I have been trying to read this for book club since February and I have pretty much given up. I’m thinking he isn’t for me either though I think I will give his other books a shot before totally turning my back.
That was the only Rushdie book I’ve ever read – though I finished it, it didn’t make me want to rush out and try something else by him