The Dead Secret by Wilkie Collins

thedeadsecretWilkie Collins was a pioneer of the sensation novel, the genre often considered a precursor to detective and suspense fiction. I’ve long been a fan of his work, particularly The Woman in White and The Moonstone though I also enjoyed No Name and Armadale. I’m less familiar with the other 20 or so novels and novellas he wrote from the mid 1850s until his death in 1889  so I decided to delve into his earlier work. But it’s clear from reading one of those,  The Dead Secret, that even this maestro had his off days.

The Dead Secret was the fourth of his novels to be published, unveiled in 1857 to Victorian readers in serial format in Household Words, the magazine edited by his friend Charles Dickens. It was the first full length novel that Collins  wrote specifically for serialisation. According to his introduction to the book format published later in the year, he wrote it to show ‘the influence of a heavy responsibility on a naturally timid woman, whose mind was neither strong enough to bear it, nor bold enough to drop it altogether.’

The plot centres on a deathbed confession written as a letter by Mrs Treverton, a former actress, to her husband Captain Treverton.  She makes her servant Sarah Leeson swear an oath to deliver it to the Captain. But Sarah disobeys her dying mistresses’ wishes.  Instead she hides the letter in a disused room at the Treverton home at Porthgenna  in Cornwall.  And then she disappears.

Fifteen years or so pass during which time Mrs Treverton’s only daughter Rosamund gets married. By one of those coincidences that happens only in novels, Sarah Leeson (under an assumed name) obtains a post as servant to Rosamund and conveys to her the cryptic warning “when you go to Porthgenna, keep out of the Myrtle Room”. Rosamund, being the headstrong girl she is, immediately upon hearing that warning resolves that she absolutely must go to Porthgenna. And must of course, find that room and discover the secret.

To explain any more about the story would spoil the mystery. There are plenty of really big clues dropped by Collins however so it doesn’t take any ace detective skills to work out the nature of the secret well before the end.  Along the way we get plenty of sensational episodes. The novel opens with a wonderfully gothic death bed scene; later on we find the servants tremoulousy making their way through the disused rooms of Porthgenna, fearful that at any minute they will meet a ghost. The cast of characters tremble, faint and declaim whenever they are not engaged in hand-wringing or tears that is.

Most of the characters are not particularly memorable. The few exceptions are really in the minor parts. I would have been delighted for example to spend more time in the company of the hilariously hypochondric Mr Phippen.

Wherever Mr. Phippen went, the woes of Mr. Phippen’s stomach went with him. He dieted himself publicly, and physicked himself publicly. He was so intensely occupied with himself and his maladies, that he would let a chance acquaintance into the secret of the condition of his tongue at five minutes’ notice; being just as perpetually ready to discuss the state of his digestion as people in general are to discuss the state of the weather.

With his aversion to anything that might disturb his constitution and equanimity, this ‘A Martyr to Dyspepsia’ was clearly a prototype for Frederick Fairlie in A Woman in White.  Equally engaging was the devious servant Mr Shrowl, a man with an eye always open for the chance to get one up on his employer.  I’ll pass discreetly over Rosamund, one of the most irritating characters I’ve encountered in a novel for many years, to talk about Sarah, the servant whose actions drive the plot and whose behaviour, though bizarre at times, does at least compel our sympathy..

Collins creates a mystery about her from the first time we encounter her, making much of her  distinctive appearance. Though she has the face of a young woman, her hair is prematurely grey. This is a woman we’re told who has experienced suffering.

Much in her manner, and more in her face, said plainly and sadly: I am the wreck of something that you might once have liked to see; a wreck that can never be repaired—that must drift on through life unnoticed, unguided, unpitied—drift till the fatal shore is touched, and the waves of Time have swallowed up these broken relics of me forever.

Only much later do we discover the traumatic event responsible for her looks and why she is drawn to the grave of a young man killed in a mining accident. By the time she meets up with the Treverton family again, Leeson feels she is a haunted woman, fighting to keep her emotions in check so the truth of the past and her part in it, is not revealed.

As interesting as some of these characters are, this is a novel that is overlong, has a shaky plot and a secret that is far too obvious to justify the reader’s sustained interest. Contemporary critics were not over enthused by it, The Athenaeum published a lengthy review but judged it only moderately successful, with “too much made of too little mystery.”

Given these flaws it’s astonishing that in just over a year, Collins could rectify these defects and produce The Woman in White, one of the great mystery thrillers of the nineteenth century. Its intricate plot and superb characterisation (who can possibly forget the incomparable Count Fosco and his adversary Marian Halcombe) make The Dead Secret pale into insignificance.


About BookerTalk

What do you need to know about me? 1. I'm from Wales which is one of the countries in the UK and must never be confused with England. 2. My life has always revolved around the written and spoken word. I worked as a journalist for nine years then in international corporate communications 3. My tastes in books are eclectic. I love realism and hate science fiction and science fantasy. 4. I am trying to broaden my reading horizons geographically by reading more books in translation

Posted on January 7, 2016, in Book Reviews, British authors, Classics Club and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 26 Comments.

  1. What a pity it doesn’t quite work because it does sound as if it has all the ingredients for a delicious Gothic horror. The unfortunate thing is I may have to read it now, just to find out what’s in the Myrtle Room… 😉

  2. I’ve read only his famous works – Woman in White and Moonstone, and I’ve been meaning to read some of his others (especially after I read Drood last year, which is all about Wilkie Collins). After your review of this one, I will probably consider Armadale or No Name instead.

  3. I’ve read The Woman in White, No Name and The Moonstone. I must read more! This is one author I just don’t get the same vibe from on my kindle. I need to curl up with the paperback 😊📖

  4. I sadly still haven’t read anything by Wilkie Collins but I really want too! Does sounds like from this review that I need to start with his more famous works 🙂

  5. Unfortunately the general consensus is that the four novels you mention as having enjoyed are really the only good work that Collins produced. It is such a disappointment because you think you’ve discovered a veritable treasure of delights when you see how many novels he wrote only then to discover that they are very second rate. The pity is not that he had an off day, but that he had so few ‘on’ days. (If that’s the appropriate term.)

  6. I love the description of Mr Phippen. I know someone just like that! I read Armadale a while back when I was looking for descriptions of the Norfolk Broads for something I was working on at the time but found it a bit of a slog. Love The Woman in White though and also the The Moonstone.

  7. I loved The Moonstone and thought that Collins’s attempts to say something about how poor, ugly women are bound by impossible demands and strictures was fascinating, especially in conjunction with the way that the young, wealthy, pretty heroine is still patronised shamelessly by all of the men around her. Shame that The Dead Secret seems to be a bit less nuanced (though I think you’re right–authors who knocked out material so prolifically were bound to have off days!)

    • I certainly can’t describe The Dead Secret as nuanced. Have you read Woman in White – its a fascinating portrait of a very strong woman who in some ways takes on the attributes of a man to fight for justice.

      • I haven’t read that one yet, but it does seem extremely interesting. I’ve certainly got more time for Collins’s ideas about women than for Dickens’s.

  8. Interesting- I’ve only read Woman in White and The Moonstone. It sounds like the main interest here is as a precursor to The Woman in White. You’ve encouraged me to seek out No Name and Armadale though!

  9. Gosh, Wilkie Collins – there’s a name from my youth. I’ve only read The Woman in White, which I enjoyed very much. I like the way you’ve highlighted the limitations of this novel alongside its strengths – it’s good to see such a balanced review.

    • You surprise me – you’ve read so much I was sure you’d have read The Moonstone. it’s a very carefully constructed mystery which is said to have introduced the first fictional detective (not sure that is entirely true but its an oft repeated statement)

  10. Thanks for this review! I LOVED The Moonstone and really enjoyed The Woman in White, so I’m curious about his other novels. I know that this has its flaws, but do you think it’s still worth reading? Which Collins book would you recommend if I’ve only read the aforementioned two?

  11. I’m a great fan of Collins. Armadale is one of my all time favorites.

    • interesting to see that because Armadale isn’t one that gets as much attention usually as The Moonstone or Woman in White. I have it on my classics club list as a re-read

      • When I was in a little group reading all of Wilkie’s novels, we found that there were two different camps – those who preferred The Woman in White and those who preferred The Moonstone. I was on the Moonstone side, hence there are a good number of his novels which I prefer over TWIW.

  12. Love your honest review. It seems as if this might be a good one to read if interested in the development of Collins’ writing skills. I own a copy of The Moonstone and it keeps ‘eyeing’ me! 🙂 I believe 2016 is the year I will finally read a Collins book, but probably not this one, at least not first! 🙂

    • That would be a good reason to read the earlier work indeed Lynn. But yes this would not be the best place to start to get to know him. Far richer material awaits

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: