Staying On by Paul Scott: Delightful End to Raj Quartet
i felt bereft when I reached the final book in The Raj Quartet series by Paul Scott.
Division Of The Spoils, published in 1975, depicted the final years of British rule in India and the birth of a newly-independent state. It’s a process that Scott once described as ‘the British coming to the end of themselves as they were’.
For many of the key figures in the tetralogy, the new order did indeed force them to question their own attitudes and beliefs. Only a few chose to remain once they were no longer in charge of the country.
Some of the main characters : the Layton family, Hari Kumar (unjustly imprisoned for rape) and – the villain of the saga, Maj./Lt. Col. Ronald Merrick – are shown embarking on a new phase of their lives. But we’re left with questions about the future for the Indian nation itself, with only an uneasy truce in place between Muslims and Hindus.
Return To Pankot
Fortunately Paul Scott returned to the setting of his quartet with Staying On, published in 1977. It gave me a much welcome opportunity to return to the small hill town of Pankot that featured in the Raj Quartet.
It is now 20 years after independence. Only one British couple remain in Pankot: Tusker and Lucy Smalley who were minor characters in the earlier novels. The sun has set on the “golden years” of their time in India as members of the British Raj .
Tusker’s retirement from the British Indian Army and his subsequent career in administration for a maharaja left them with limited funds. These have been further eroded it transpires, by a stint of gambling.
Life After The Raj
By the time we meet them in Staying On they are living in straightened circumstances in the Lodge, a small annex of Smith’s Hotel. It was once the town’s principal hotel but is now overshadowed by the brash new Shiraz Hotel.
The Smalleys are, just like Smith’s Hotel, adrift in the new India. They try desperately to cling to the old order with its esteemed values of the family and tradition and its strict codes of behaviour. But such currency no longer matters in the new nation, in which it is the entrepreneurs and money makers, not the army and the civil service who hold sway.
The Smalleys are an ill matched pair. He is brusque, irascible and prone to spontaneous irrational actions; she is loquacious, a romanticist who believes many of the young English officers she has met over the years, were secretly attracted to her. Lucy Smalley has never forgiven her husband for deciding — without consulting her — that they would ‘stay on’ in India after he retired from the army.
As her husband’s health declines, she becomes increasingly worried about her financial status when he dies. But her pleas for information are unanswered and in place of real conversations with her taciturn husband she creates imaginary dialogues in which she shows a male visitor the delights of Pankot and introduces him to local society.
What Scott brings to life is that despite the feelings of frustrations, anger and disappointment that encircle the Tusker’s marriage, there is still an affection that has endured.
Staying On is in essence a tale of loss; of unfulfilled dreams and people whose years are lived always on the fringe because they never quite ‘fit in’.
When I first read Staying On more than 20 years ago, the comic storyline of the larger-than-life Mrs Bhoolabhoy and her henpecked husband seemed to dominate the novel. I felt the domestic nature of the plot made the novel feel rather lightweight in comparison to the Raj Quartet. But reading Staying On again, the poignancy of Lucy’s story came more to the forefront. How could I not feel sorry for a woman who has
a faraway look in her eyes as if looking back into places she’s walked in her long-ago shoes.
Staying On is a much quieter novel than the Raj Quartet.
Gone are the questions around loyalty to one’s birth nation and community versus loyalty to an acquired social group like the regiment. Gone also is the question Scott poses in The Jewel in the Crown (the first of the quartet) about the personal and socio-political consequences that arise when individuals try to cross the racial divide.
There are certainly no dramatic events in Staying On like the rape in Jewel in the Crown, or the massacre on the train in Division of the Spoils. In fact the main drama of Staying On is dispensed with in the very first page where we learn that Tusker has died while Lucy is at their hairdressers.
And yet there is one theme that seems to tie all five novels together – the ability of human beings to connect with each other; whether across class or across the breakfast table. Lucy and Tusker have as much of a divide between them as Ronald Meyrick and Sarah Layton or Daphne Manners and Hari Kumar experience in The Jewel In The Crown.
Staying On is a delightful end to Scott’s epic about India and its fight for independence against a ruling class determined not to let go of their power. I loved the way Scott mixed in familiar characters and locations from previous novels, yet showed that life had changed. Though it doesn’t tackle the same big issues or focus on highly dramatic events, this novel still provides an interesting perspective on the Colonial experience.
Staying On by Paul Scott: End Notes
About the book: Staying On was published in 1977, two years after the final book in the Raj Quartet series. The tetralogy had not been universally acclaimed; Scott faced accusations that he had written caricatures of the British in India and those who served them. By contrast, Staying On was named as winner of the Booker Prize in 1977.
About the author: Paul Scott was born in England. In 1943 he was posted as an officer cadet to India, ending the war as a captain in the Indian Army Service Corps, Despite being initially appalled by the attitudes of the British, by the heat and dust, by the disease and poverty and by the sheer numbers of people, he fell deeply in love with India.
His writing career began in earnest with his first published novel in 1952, going on to achieve moderate success. The crowning glory of his career was winning the Booker Prize in 1977. Sadly he did not have long to enjoy the success . In the year he won the award, he was diagnosed with cancer. He was too ill to attend the prize giving ceremony and died five months later.
Why I Read This Book: I first read Staying On in the late 1990s but decided to read it again as part of my Booker Prize project.
This review was posted originally in 2012. This updated version incorporates biographical information about the author and an updated image of the book cover . Formatting has been changed to improve readability.
17 thoughts on “Staying On by Paul Scott: Delightful End to Raj Quartet”
I have very fond memories of reading both this and the Raj Quartet, and of the TV adaptations. Staying On was particularly enjoyable starring the perfectly cast Trevor Howard and Celia Johnson.
I’ve watched Raj Quartet umpteen times. one of my favourite adaptations. I went to see a stage version of Staying On once but had to leave at the interval because it was so bad
It’s years since I read this, but I absolutely loved it. I have also read the Raj Quartet twice. You’re making me Want to revisit them.
They are books that will reward a re-reading I think Ali
I am so glad that there are still some people around who not only remember Paul Scott but also love his works. He is one of my favourite writers and I have read all his novels. Staying On was at one time prescribed in a few university courses in India but sadly that time is now past and I don’t see his novels in second-hand bookshops as it used to be earlier. I felt really sad when he wasn’t even remembered in a book discussing ‘forgotten authors’. Really enjoyed your review of the book. It is not as much as a favourite as certain other books of Scott but now after reading your review I want to read it again:)
I’ve not read anything else by him apart from the Raj series and Staying On but delighted to know his other books are worth reading too. He does seem to have disappeared from our consciousness
This is the one that won the Booker, yes?
It is indeed, in 1977
Pingback: Top Ten Tuesday: The First Ten Books I Reviewed | BookerTalk
I love the works of Paul Scott.I am his ardent admirer.It is a pity his true worth is yet to be realized and projected properly. Your write up is very good.Thanks.
he does seem to have fallen from the public eye doesn’t he. It’s such a shame because the Raj Quartet is a fabulous set of books. Thaks for the compliment by the way!
Pingback: Sunday Salon: Hey Ho the Wind and the Rain « BookerTalk
These 5 novels sounds fascinating. I’ve never even heard of them before or of Paul Scott. The little I’ve read of India in Rushdie’s ‘Shalimar the Clown’ and Irving’s ‘A Son of the Circus’ has fascinated me so I would like to read more. On the wish list they go!
@Alex: I enjoyed the TV series also thanks to some very fine actors and a generous budget which enabled ITV to go for quality. Let us all know how your summer school goes…
This is one of the books we have chosen for our Summer School this year, so I’m very interested to read your thoughts. Like you I first read it about fifteen years ago and am now wondering if I will also have a different reaction to it. I don’t think anyone else in the group has read it previously but a lot of them are the same age as the Smalley’s and I think that will very much colour their responses. I wish I had time to go back and re-read the Quartet but I shall have to content myself with watching the TV series, which all things said wasn’t too bad.
Interesting background on Paul Scott & his books. I will have to go back for these … thanks
When you think how much effort he would have put into those novels, it must have been so depressing to have them disparaged – no wonder he turned to drink.