Cover of Middle England by Jonahan Coe, a novel which seeks to capture the mood in the UK at the time of the EU referendum

This week marked the 8th anniversary of the referendum that saw the UK vote to end our membership of the European Union. The vote caused arguments between friends and neighbours; family rifts (especially between young remainers and older relatives who voted leave) and the end of political careers.

In Middle England, Coe uses the Brexit debate as a key element in his state-of-the-nation novel, depicting characters who are on different sides of the Leave/Remain debate. Though the novel doesn’t come down strongly in favour of either camp, the “leavers” with their racist and homophobic tendencies seemed to be less sympathetically drawn than the “remainers” .

Set in the Midlands and London, the novel covers a period of immense change and disruption in Britain. It starts out with the newly elected coalition government in 2010, taking in the riots of 2011, the euphoric national pride around the 2012 Olympics in London and then the vote to leave the EU. Coe also fleshes out the historical context with references to other news events (a protestor disrupts the Boat Race, a woman MP is murdered).

We see these events through the eyes of multiple characters with the chief focus on Sophie — an art history lecturer married to a driving instructor whose views become increasingly right-wing as the narrative progresses — and her uncle Benjamin a writer whose magnum opus has grown so big he has to carry it in two holdalls.

Around them circle characters who represent different strands of society and levels of satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the state of affairs. So we get Doug, a political journalist and his “smash the system” teenage daughter; a mega wealthy business man whose practices only just keep within the law and Charlie, a children’s entertainer who lives in his car and subsists on food banks.


‘Cameron’s only part of the story anyway,’ Charlie continued. ‘The way I see it, everything changed in Britain in May 1979. Forty years on, we’re still dealing with that. You see – me and Benjamin, we’re children of the seventies. We may have been only kids then, but that was the world we grew up in. Welfare state, NHS. Everything that was put in place after the war. Well, all that’s been unravelling since ’79. It’s still being unravelled. That’s the real story.’

The entertainer isn’t the only character who thinks they have their finger on the pulse of Middle England. The journalist Doug Anderton has been observing the ever widening gulf in British society for years, priding himself on his ability to judge the public mood and concluding that there’s “an incredible fault line running right through British society.” His newspaper columns are highly critical of the social inequalities that have become more apparent yet — irony of irony — he enjoys a privileged life himself, married to an heiress and living in a Chelsea home valued at £6million.

It’s just one of the many examples of humour injected into a novel that has a point to make about the levels of disgruntlement and frustration in the 2000s. Is Middle England the definitive “novel of our era?” I doubt it — I would actually have welcome less of the humour and more of an edge. Still, it was an enjoyable read.

25 responses to “Middle England by Jonathan Coe — giving voice to the disgruntled”

  1. This novel brought me back to Coe after some twenty years. I picked it up shortly after the publication of his latest, Bournville. I enjoyed both – the latter at least in part because I spent my university years in Birmingham and love the city.

    As for Middle England, reading it some five years after it was published gave me a useful distance from the events and passions depicted. The conflicts between family members and friends ring true. No doubt Coe’s take on Brexit is similar to mine; but he presents the ‘other side’ quite convincingly, in my view.

    1. Writing about recent history is a tricky thing to pull off. I thought he managed it well.

  2. I’ve not read this one but did love Bournville – this one seems a blunter tool, perhaps. It’s good to try to write a state of the nation book but …

    1. It’s not easy writing that kind of book when you are so close to the events – you need a certain distance away from it to put it into perspective I think.

  3. ” Though the novel doesn’t come down strongly in favour of either camp, the “leavers” with their racist and homophobic tendencies seemed to be less sympathetically drawn than the “remainers”.”
    That happens in so many novels here about the political divide. Everyone who supports the GOP is not a racist, bigoted, Bible-waving, You-Know-Who-loving-crazy. It’s to the point of a check-list or bingo card for reading certain types of novels. Ditto the presentation of the left by the right. Interesting to here it isn’t just here in the USA.

    1. It’s much easier to write a novel if you just have to tick certain boxes! Ou political system isn’t great but at least our election campaigns only last 5 weeks – how you cope with practically two years of it I can’t imagine. Don’t people just switch off??

      1. Part of the reason you-know-who is still around is ELECTION FATIGUE. People have tuned out completely which certainly helps wanna be dictators. Any type “limit” is anathema. Do you know we can even idiotically check a box on our tax returns to donate to the presidential elections? Who in their right mind would….. We desperately need term limits, and I think the old idea of a single six-year term for President. They waste so much time making sure they get a second term before they even try to do what they’ve promised. It’s absurd. And, even thought we can vote a split ticket–that is vote for each office individually regardless of party, most people vote a straight ticket. So why bother calling it a Republic or having a congress. Then there’s the insane Electoral College which, if understood, does still make a tiny bit of sense.

        1. Time after time my colleagues in Michigan would try to explain the whole electoral college thing to me – either I was a terrible student or the system really is that complex.
          A split vote – that’s the first time I’ve heard that’s possible, Why would anyone want to do that – it’s basically saying they can’t make up their minds but feel they have to vote anyway. Here we get people spoiling their vote as a way of protesting against all the parties.

      2. Plus I STILL get youtube ads of Hilary with the leather-bound Inaugural Address she didn’t get to give. I wish she had been able to give it, but come on! Almost 4 years later?

        1. That does seem ludicrous. I mean the chances of her now getting back into a senior government role are pretty slim I’d think so what is the point of the ads???

  4. I loved Coe’s novel Bournville, which seemed to me to avoid many of the traps of the contemporary political novel by mostly being set in the past—he goes back to the ’40s and moves forward to 2020 in leaps, which seems a much more rich and interesting way of actually *showing* us how May of ’79 (and earlier developments) have brought us to where we find ourselves at the end of the 21st century’s first quarter. Haven’t read Middle England but I wonder if I’d find it more frustrating, because he’s writing in a more obvious up-to-the-moment way.

    1. Interesting point Elle, reading about events that are within our own life times and knowledge is rather different than reading about the past.we come to the more contemporary narrative with more of a preconception maybe?

  5. I’m a Coe fan but was very disppointed by this one. Subtlety seemed to have gone out of the window. I felt bludgeoned by its message despite being an ardent Remainer.

    1. It was fairly obvious what side he was on ….

  6. I read this when it was first published. It may have seemed more to the point then than perhaps it does now.

    1. I think authors take a chance when they write about events that are within the living memory of their readers.

  7. I was fascinated by this novel… I don’t know how well it represents all the points-of-view but it showed me a side of England that I really didn’t know.

    1. Maybe because I was living through the pre-Brexit stuff in the UK, I got more exposed to it than you did?

      1. Well, of course I don’t speak for all Australians, but we got reports about it here and I just thought that it was so unlikely to happen I just stopped paying attention. It turned out to be like the election of Trump, so bizarre and unexpected, that I just couldn’t quite believe it would ever happen and I stopped paying attention to that too.
        After years of practice at not paying attention to popular culture in the media, it was easy to do… and I was horribly wrong about it…

        1. I stopped paying attention to French politics too, thinking that yes the far right group would rattle the cages but they’d never really get anywhere near the number of votes that would enable them to form a government. Looks like I was seriously out of touch….

        2. It’s worrying, isn’t it…

        3. Very very worrying. It might not be confined to France either

        4. Weirdly, I’m more worried about it in other places than I am about France. People notice France, they pay attention. But what goes on in those EU-come-lately countries that pretend to share its values so that they can get the economic benefits?

        5. It’s all disturbing when you add that to the situations in Gaza and Ukraine. I fear we are heading for some very turbulent times

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading