One of my favourite episodes in Alan Bennett’s Talking Heads series of dramatic monologues concerns a voracious letter-writer. The main character in A Lady of Letters, Irene Ruddock , hides her loneliness behind a stream of letters to newspapers, grieving relatives of a woman she barely knew, The Queen, crematorium officials and the police.

Sybil Van Antwerp, the central figure in Virginia Evans’s The Correspondent, is just as voracious a letter-writer. The recipients of her communications are more personal — they include her brother, a best friend, the troubled young son of a former colleague and two potential suitors. She also writes to real-life figures, including Ann Patchett, George Lucas and Joan Didion.

Just as with Alan Bennett’s character, Sybil writes with purpose and precision; sometimes writing a first draft to ensure she has chosen the right tone and construction. She’s direct, tetchy and often at odds with the world. “Dear Rosalie,” begins one letter to a long-term friend, “I haven’t heard from you. Waiting for your response to my last, but cannot wait for ever.” În another she castigates a newspaper columnist for errors in his piece about her work in the legal system.

Through letters spanning eight years, we uncover the history of Sybil’s life as a 73-year-old widow, her reputation as a formidable legal clerk and the distant relationships with her two children. Her letters are honest – but only up to point. It’s only through an unsent letter to an unnamed correspondent that we discover the truth about a family tragedy and Sybil’s fears that her failing eyesight will bring an end to a lifetime of letter-writing.

As fascinating as this cranky, sharp-tongued woman is, The Correspondent isn’t just about the letter-writer. It’s an exploration of the joys — and limitations — of the art of written correspondence itself.

Sybil has always made sense of her world through writing, her correspondence has been, as she puts it, “the mainstay of my life” and a true expression of who she really is Though she does use email, she’s not a fan — they are no no substitute for the real thing. True letters, she believes, help keep the memory of a person alive.

Imagine the letters one has sent out into the world, the letters received back in return are like the pieces of a magnificent puzzle or, a better metaphor, the links of a long chain and even if those links are never put back together .. even if they remain for the rest of time, dispersed across the earth like the fragile blown seeds of a dandelion, isn’t there something wonderful in that, to think that a story of one’s life is preserved in some way, that this letter may one day mean something , even if it is very small, to someone?

But as the novel progresses we see how she begins to question the validity of that belief.

All those letteers, I wonder if all of it was a waste. Pages and pages of letters, I wonder what has it all been really. I’ll go blind and they will mean nothing to me. It will be as if they aren’t there and does that mean, in a way, they were never there.

As readers we detect — way before Sybil does herself — that the letters act as a defence mechanism. A way of putting distance between herself and other people so she doesn’t have to face uncomfortable truths. Only by the end of the novel do we learn why this protective shield is so important to her; why she is so remote from her daughter and son yet shows such affection for a friend’s child.

The Correspondent is a highly-readable novel, astutely navigating the challenges of the epistolary device and (largely) first-person narrative. Yes it does require some willingness to accept unreality (would Joan Didion really share her thoughts with a reader about the loss of a child?) but put those aside, and you’re left with a solid story of about a life and grief.

For an alternative perspective on The Correspondent, take a look at the review by Lisa at ANZlitlovers

Postscript

Since writing my review, The Correspondent has been named as the winner of the Women’s Prize for Fiction for 2026.

20 responses to “The Correspondent by Virginia Evans — life between the lines”

  1. I enjoyed this novel very much, and your review made me consider it once again. Thinking only about my personal reaction to it, I was impressed that the book slowly made me care about Sybil, someone whom I initially found unpleasant. It was a strength of the book that Sybil never stopped being difficult, picky, and even cruel, but I was forced to care about her (notice I’m not saying “like” her, because I’m not sure I ever did) as I came to understand the reasons for her behavior. I respect an author who can change my mind about a character in this way.

    1. I did warm to her by the end though, as you say, I didn’t “like” her either.

      1. I think that is what makes her such a wonderful character is that she is full of flaws and biases. I love how they get her into trouble such as with the guy in the DNA agency. Her errors and attempts to correct them or to ignore them make her accessible, and I think that seeing that Sybil had capacity for kindness such as with the son of a colleague and the school girl that wants to interview her, round her out.

        1. Agree with you Rach that she is very rounded. I liked the fact we saw her flaws and her strengths.

  2. Excellent review. I liked this book but, due to working in law, I had one quivel with a part of the story. Overall it was very good.

    1. I had a few quibbles too – like would she really write to a neighbour??

      1. LOL! I guess I looked at that as–you never managed to connect so you left a note. But a full letter? Yeah–I’m with you. But how the heck did a lawyer think it was appropriate and ethical to send someone jobs to apply for at their work email???? Utterly stupid.

        1. I’d forgotten about the emails to the employee. It was another example of how she was keen to devote time and energy to supporting someone she didn’t really know while neglecting her own children

        2. Indeed–much easier than facing the mess at home, I imagine since that involves looking in the mirror.

  3. I do fancy reading this one, people seem to either love it or loathe. I’m interested to see what camp I fall into.

    1. I’ve seen a few lukewarm reviews but none that indicate the reader loathed it. I understand why it might not be to everyone’s taste, but can’t really comprehend what was so bad about it that it would create that level of dislike

  4. As you know because you visited my review, I thought this novel flawed. Each to his own, I guess, but what I find amazing that with a whole wide world of wonderful books to choose from, the Women’s Prize landed on something like this.

    1. There were a few flaws but overall I did enjoy it. I don’t follow the Women’s Prize so if I read one of the nominees or winners its by accident and then often wonder why the judges rated it so highly

      1. Well, it’s just won the prize, so don’t take any notice of me!

        1. I was surprised when I saw the announcement. I enjoyed the book more than you did but wouldn’t have put it down as an award-winner

  5. A memorable and unforgettable character!

    1. True, whether you liked or disliked her, it would be hard to ignore a character like Sybil

  6. Staircase Wit Avatar
    Staircase Wit

    It’s such a great book for discussion between the letters, the relationships, the secrets she has avoided facing, the effects of aging, and even the career she should have had instead of being a clerk. My book group loved it. I didn’t think it deserved *all* the hype but I enjoyed a book we could all react to in different ways.

    1. It’s so much more interesting if the book chosen for the group to read has different dimensions that you can discuss like this one does

  7. Why those 8 years worth of letters, I’m wondering. This is a first “novel” written by someone half the age of her protagonist but it has reached the shortlist of the Women’s Prize as has Lily King so is reaching a great number of readers outside the US. Virginia Evans’ dad ran a retirement community. This intrigued me as James Michener has a filler novel called Recessional which tells you all you could want to learn about such places (“it’s not a luxury nursing home”). Based on Recessional, Sybil van Antwerp sounds quite believable. Will I read this ? Hmm, not sure.

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading