London Falling has many of the elements that wouldn’t look out of place in a thriller. Russian oligarchs, vicious hit men, shady “businessmen”‘ and a body tumbling over a balcony within sight of the UK’s national security agency.

Except Keefe’s book isn’t fiction. This is a detailed work of journalistic investigation centred on the death of 19-year-old Londoner Zac Brettler in November 2019.

When Zac’s body was recovered from a muddy stretch of the Thames, police deemed that this was a clear case of suicide. CCTV footage from MI6 headquarters on the opposite bank showed the exact moment the boy jumped from the balcony of a luxury apartment building. He was alone so couldn’t have been pushed to his death.

But Zac’s parents were not convinced. There were too many questions unanswered, and many many gaps in the Metropolitan police investigation. As Rachelle and Matthew Brettler were to discover there was nothing about their son’s death — or indeed his life — that was clear cut.

They knew their son loved to move in circles very different from his comfortable middle class upbringing. He frequently regaled the Brellters with tales about fancy restaurants in Mayfair, blackjack sessions in a casino and encounters with Russian millionaires at Annabel’s night club. The boy assured them he could afford this lifestyle because he was involved in big investment deals — at one point he showed Matthew his bank statement with a £850,000 balance.

Increasingly Zac’s talk was of the deals he was making through two oldr men he called his friends: a “rubber tycoon” called Verinder Sharma, and Akbar Shamji, a Ugandan Asian cryptocurrency and property dealer.

What the Brettlers never suspected was that all along, Zac had been leading a double life. His new acquaintances knew him not as Zac Brettler from Maida Vale, but as Zac Ismailov, the son and heir of a Russian oligarch. He concinced them his father was dead, he had inherited a fortune but his mother, who lived in Dubai, was blocking access to the estate.

In London Calling ,Keefe reveals that Zac was not alone in his ability to dissemble.

Akbar Shamji wasn’t a successful businessman — previous ventures into record production and films had collapsed and he was saddled with a string of unpaid debts. Verinder Sharma wasn’t a rubber tycoon but a drug dealer, hustler and violent gangland enforcer known as “Indian Dave”. He was an expert at ‘finding ways to insinuate himself into the lives of people who had money, cultivating a queasy friendship, before turning on them, ferociously, with demands’.

Did these men turn on Zac when they discovered he was not the money bags he’d led them to believe? Was his leap from the bridge a desperate attempt to save himself? Keefe suggests Zac never intended suicide, instead he dived into the river to get away only to misjudge the angle of his dive.

London Falling is a masterful piece of investigative fiction. It’s based on extensive interviews with the Brettler family and people who knew Zac at different points in his life. Keefe flags multiple instances of how the justice system failed this boy.

Though it’s the story of one boy and one family, Keefe places this in the context of geo-political shifts over five decades. He makes connections to the London stock market deregulation; Idi Amin’s expulsion of Asian families and the growth of London as an investment haven for Russian oligarchs in the post-Soviet years.

At times, Keefe’s research threatens to derail his main point but there is no denying his ability to pull back the curtains on a world where a young man becomes trapped by the allure of power and wealth.

18 responses to “London Falling by Patrick Radden Keefe — a search for truth”

  1. I bought this when it was published, but haven’t managed to make time to read it yet. Planning to do that for Non-fiction November!

  2. My husband is reading this right now. He’s not as big a reader as me and is more prone to abandoning things that don’t hold his attention than I am. It’s a sign of a good book when he’s whipping through something. Your review and the comments here from others who have read it make me want to borrow it from Mr H when he’s finished it.

    1. I hope you get a chance to read it Jan. I seldom read non fiction because they tend to get dragged down by the extent of the author’s research but this one reads as a good story

  3. I’ve seen this one about a lot and it does sound gripping. A tragic story, and a powerful piece of non-fiction.

    1. More shocking even than his death was the extent to which the boy and his parents were failed by the justice system. Police simply didn’t do a thorough job of the investigation, failing to interview key figures or challenging other people’s accounts.

  4. One of my books of the year.

    1. I’d heard only snippets of the story – they were disturbing enough but all the details about the flawed police investigation were shocking

  5. This was such a gripping – and unsettling – read. Simple smash and grab raids aren’t anything like enough these days apparently.

    1. It made me feel so angry to learn how many mistakes police made in their so called investigation

      1. Indeed. Not very reassuring.

  6. Wow!! I’ve seen this book in the UK press. It sounds really good.

    1. Well worth reading. It’s extremely detailed and I did get lost at times but that didn’t matter in the end. The drive of the narrative was so good

      1. It’s books like this that actually make me miss my endless commute–I’d just get lost in them. But, it is nice to be out-of-the car! Now if I could wean myself off watching reels all night. I watch one and suddenly it’s 1:30 in the morning!

        1. The algorithms are designed to keep us watching. I have the same problem with watching You Tube late at night

  7. What a dreadful story!
    But surely, even naïve middle class parents must have realised he was up to no good when he showed them that bank balance.

    1. I’ve read this book (one of my five-star reads this year, it was gripping) – the way Keefe tells it, the parents really didn’t know and that was because Zac was pretty devious and deliberate about the way he went about things.

      There may have been a certain degree of turning a blind eye because the parents chose to send him to a school where he was mixing with a different crowd, but this came about after he failed to get into the school that they felt was more suitable and where his older brother attended. From memory, Zac had a tantrum about that, and was considered a ‘challenging’ child, so there was a lot of appeasing him (which we know is never going to end well). Anyway, once he was ‘appeased’ and at the school he wanted to be at, it seemed he had settled so I think his parents weren’t pushing anything to avoid rocking the boat. The parents were also worried about drugs and I think drug tested him, which they found no evidence of, so were then thinking there was nothing to see (and I do understand that attitude – as a parent, you’re thinking drugs are the worst-case-scenario, you wouldn’t dream this scenario!).

      1. I can see how that sounds convincing. And yes, I’ve met my share of parents Who Do Not Have A Clue and are deep into denial if someone tries to tell them!

        1. The parents were very aware that Zac was an unusual boy – they took him to therapy at one time in his younger phase. But he was also very, very convincing. He had a credible enough Russian accent and knowledge about some regions of the country that people believed him. The parents met one of his “business partners” and never suspected anything amiss there.

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading