Dickens’ Little Dorrit: A review

English authorsCorruption; inept officialdom; capitalism, the pretensions of social class and status:  few elements of Victorian life seem to escape Dickens’ scrutiny in Little Dorrit. 

Published in monthly instalments between 1855 and 1857, first reactions from the critics were not very favourable. They completely overlooked the social critique element  and focused their attention instead on what they considered an unnecessarily incoherent plot and insubstantial, two-dimensional figures.  Fortunately the mid twentieth century saw a revival of interest in the novel and a significant shift in attitude. In fact attitudes shifted so far that George Bernard Shaw claimed Little Dorrit was a more seditious text than Marx’s Das Kapital while  George Orwell declared that “in Little Dorrit, Dickens attacked English institutions with a ferocity that has never since been approached.”

Much of Dickens’ ire in Little Dorrit is focused on government bureaucracy. He brings it to life with the wonderfully imaginative  invention of the Circumlocution Office. It’s a government department run entirely it seems by the incompetent and the inept (ring any bells???). Its sole purpose is to frustrate and obstruct anyone who has the temerity to ask for information or assistance. Forms need to be filled in just to request permission to fill in more forms to ask for an appointment.(the Soviets learned a thing or two from the Circumlocution Office methinks).

marshalseaSome of his greatest anger is directed at debtors’ prisons such as the notorious Marshalsea in which people who owed money were imprisoned until they repaid their debts.  It was an impossible situation because they were not allowed to work so had to rely on family or friends to help pay bills and to provide food and clothing.  Such becomes the fate of William Dorrit who moves his entire family into the Marshalsea when he becomes a bankrupt. His youngest daughter  Amy (the Little Dorrit of the title) is born within its walls, becoming a true child of the Marshalsea.

But even in prison the appearance of gentility and the gradations of class and status must be maintained.  The Marshalsea inhabitants  refer to themselves as “collegians” rather than prisoners; Papa Dorrit pretends ignorance about the fact his daughters go out to work every day to put food on the table, and openly solicits financial gifts from visitors, masks their true nature by calling them  “tributes”  and ‘testimonials’. As his status within the prison rises and he becomes the longest-serving resident, so his consciousness of his status increases, going into orbit when he is released upon discovery  that he is in fact a very wealthy man.

What Dickens shows is the personal cost of such esteem for one’s position in life. Mr Dorrit is so blinkered by his sense of his own importance that he fails to connect with the one person who loves him without question – his daughter Amy. Though she has loved him without question for decades, cared for him and undergone personal suffering so that he would be spared, he does not recognise the debt he owes her.  Instead he subjects her to criticism over petty mistakes and castigates her when she doesn’t wholeheartedly welcome and adopt the trappings of the family’s new-found wealth.  Does he repent on his deathbed as characters do in so many novels?  I won’t spoil the plot by disclosing that; you’ll just have to read the novel yourself.

The Dorrits are a far cry from the epitome of the happy loving families found in Dickens’s earlier works. None of the families in Little Dorrit actually fit that particular description being neither loving nor happy. They’re all rather dysfunctional in fact. When Arthur Clenhome, one of the book’s good guys, returns to London from China where he ran the family business for twenty years  he gets as much of a welcome from his mother as if he’d just returned from a weekend in Brighton.

Like most of Dickens’ big novels, the plot does require attention to keep all the threads intact but this book isn’t anywhere as complicated as Bleak House. It also relies on a remarkable series of coincidences – the first two characters we meet in a prison in France not only turn up again in London many many chapters later and somehow manage to play key roles in the plot. But it wouldn’t be Dickens without coincidence would it. Nor would it be Dickens without a wildly extravagant female character. Just as Dombey and Son has the dippy Miss Lucretia Tox, and Martin Chuzzlewit has the drunken nurse Sarah Gamp, in Little Dorrit Dickens serves up the garrulous Flora Finching to entertain with her gushing and breathless simpering talk of nothing in particular. A brilliant invention.

So in case you haven’t twigged by now, yes I did enjoy this book. And yes I would definitely read it again.

About BookerTalk

What do you need to know about me? 1. I'm from Wales which is one of the countries in the UK and must never be confused with England. 2. My life has always revolved around the written and spoken word. I worked as a journalist for nine years then in international corporate communications 3. My tastes in books are eclectic. I love realism and hate science fiction and science fantasy. 4. I am trying to broaden my reading horizons geographically by reading more books in translation

Posted on April 2, 2013, in Classics Club and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. I loved this book, and the mini-series. 🙂 Dickens plots are generally too complex for me to understand without watching a good film adaptation first. Too many characters. But this was one of my favorites. And I enjoy seeing how Dickens portrays social injustice with his stories. 🙂

    Like

  2. What a great review! I had years and years of hating Dickens after being forced to read him in school (it ruined him for me). Then just recently my real-life book group read Great Expectations and a friend suggested I listen to it on audio book. She’d found the experience completely different to reading and much better. So I listened to Martin Jarvis’s reading and it was wonderful – moving and exciting and poignant. Now I want to try reading Dickens again, to see if I’ve recovered his whole oeuvre. I do hope so!

    Like

    • Great Expectations is a really good place to start with Dickens. Dont go and ruin it by reading Tale of Two Cites or Bleak House though. Little Dorrit is an easier one…. Karen Heenan-Davies

      ________________________________

      Like

  1. Pingback: 10 literary fathers to love or dislike | BookerTalk

  2. Pingback: 50 Questions about reading the classics: Part 2 | BookerTalk

  3. Pingback: The influence of classical books | BookerTalk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Created to Read

Book Reviews, Literary Events, Interviews & more...

Nut Press

Write at Home on the Web

Café Society

Discussing the Liberal Arts

Something More

my extensive reading

BookerTalk

Adventures with great novels around the world

Weidenfeld & Nicolson

Adventures with great novels around the world

Adventures with great novels around the world

borough-press

Just another WordPress site

JacquiWine's Journal

Mostly books, with a little wine writing on the side

FictionFan's Book Reviews

Reviews of books...and occasional other stuff.

Judith Barrow

Writer & Author

WildmooBooks

A blog about books, libraries, and literary topics.

Nonsuch Book

Adventures with great novels around the world

Adventures in reading, writing and working from home

Liz Dexter (was Broomfield) muses on freelancing, reading, researching and writing ...

THE BOOKSMITH

Mrs Smith Reads Books

Word Travel

ramblings of a reader

Words and Leaves

Words and Leaves

%d bloggers like this: