Cover of Trust, a novella about an Italian couple and a relationship haunted by secrets

There’s a premise at the heart of Domenico Starnone’s novella Trust, that never really seemed plausible. Starnone wants us to believe that secrets shared by a young couple — things they are two ashamed to confess to anyone else — haunt them for decades.

The couple in question are Pietro, a literature teacher, and Teresa, one of his students with whom he has a passionate and turbulent relationship. After one of their repeated arguments Teresa comes up with an idea she thinks will create such a strong bond between them that they will never break up again.

Let’s say I tell you a secret, something so awful that I’ve never even told it to myself, but then you have to confide something just as horrible to me, something that would destroy your life if anyone came to know it. She smiled, as if she were inviting me to play a game, but deep down she looked quite tense. Her anxiety was contagious, I was stunned, I was concerned that, at only twenty-three years of age, she could already have a secret so very unmentionable. I, at thirty, had one, and it had to do with an affair so embarrassing that I blushed just thinking about it.

Any relationship counsellor would most likely be rolling their eyes in despair overt this strategy. And they’d be right. Within days of this pledge, Pietro and Teresa break up and this time there is no going back.

They move on in life separately. She leaves Italy for the USA where she becomes a successful and famous scientist. He marries a mathematician and fellow teacher, becomes a father and gains notoriety for his radical thoughts on the education system.

Yet Pietro cannot shake off his fear that one day Teresa will turn up and blow up his carefully crafted public persona. Even 40 years or so later he still frets about the possibility.

What are these terrible secrets they shared when they were young? Since we never get to discover this, most of Trust just felt like a big tease. Of course, people can and do worry about things they let slip and later wish they’d kept silent about but are we honestly expected to believe they fret about the possibility of discovery for 40 years?? Maybe if you’re a high profile figure who has built a reputation of being squeaky- clean but Pietro isn’t anywhere in that league.

Actually Terese does in fact prick the bubble that Pietro has created around their secret: “… today, I barely remember what I told him I’d done, and I’m surprised that I recall little of what he’d confided in me,” she reflects late on in the novel.

It might have been easier to ignore the difficulties about the secret that not much of a secret , if the characters had been more interesting.But it was hard to connect with any of them.

The majority of Trust is narrated by Pietro and though he tries hard to convince us that he’s a very reasonable man, I found him an obnoxious figure.

According to his version of events, he becomes a thought-leader on education, a man who gains a large following of admirers but actually he writes one essay which gets stretched into two books. He has more than a touch of the fantasist about him I felt,

He also has a very dismissive attitude towards women, seen most particularly in the way he treats his wife. Her academic career is of minor significance compared to his own he believes. Instead of supporting her desire to gain recognition and funding for her research, he just expects her to fit this in while looking after the children. In the meantime he goes swanning off to various conferences and dinners with his attractive agent.

Why is she so dissatisfied, I’m her husband, the father of her children, she should be happy about the impression I make: the better things go for me, the better off her life, and Emma’s, and Sergio’s, and that of the baby who’s about to arrive.

On another occasion Pietro congratulates himself that she’s regained her looks after childbirth. As the last phrase indicates, once again everything revolves around him:

… now in my house and in my bed there was a stable woman who considered herself an excellent math teacher, a mother who saw after the needs of three children and a wife who, after a long period of decline, had gone back to looking after herself so as not to look bad next to a husband who’d gained some discreet success.

The book abounds with his misogynistic attitudes, making it impossible for me to feel anything but distaste for this man.

I had looked forward to reading Trust having enjoyed Trick, an earlier novella by Dominic Starnone but this latest one isn’t in the same league.

My thanks go to the publisher Europa Edition and Netgalley for my copy of this book,

15 responses to “Trust by Domenico Starnone”

  1. Excellent review–you saved me from throwing it across the room over any of the things you pointed out. Great job!

    1. I’m often tempted to do that to a book that frustrates me. Couldn’t do it this time though because it was an e-book and I didn’t want to ruin my iPad!

      1. LOL! Good self-control

  2. I think I’ve had enough of novels focusing on the destructive relationships between teachers and students, even if done well, which this one doesn’t seem to be.

    1. There are less self-indulgent books around for sure

  3. Nope, this one’s not going on the list.

    1. A wise decision

  4. Hmmm… wasn’t Starnone thought to be the writer behind the works of Elena Ferrante? I read his debut novel years ago and enjoyed it, but haven’t read anything by him since. The premise to this one does sound a bit far fetched but given the novel is called Trust I’m guessing the author wanted to really explore that issue and maybe test its limits… 🤔

    1. Maybe that was his intention but it didn’t really develop into anything you could get your teeth into.
      I’d forgotten that he’s been unmasked as the “probable” author of the Ferrante novels though the claim for that seems very casual.

  5. It sounds a bit silly.
    For my money, Edith Wharton’s The Reef (1912) is the best book around on trust. At first glance it seems silly too, and horribly dated because it’s about a woman whose suitor has ‘past experience.’ Not a Big deal in this day and age. And yet it shows how pernicious a loss of trust can be and how hard it can be to get over a betrayal.

    1. if we’d been given more of an inkling about the nature of the secret it would have been easier to buy into this but we’re not given any clues whether it was at the lower end of the scale like cheating in an exam or way at the top like fraud or murder. I don’t think it was the latter because his ex girlfriend wouldn’t have been likely to forget it

      1. I must admit, the word ‘secret’ in the blurb of a book is highly likely to make me reject reading it. It’s as if the creative writing schools have a ‘secret’ template which writers use because they can’t think of anything more interesting to write about than some banal ‘secret’.
        The silliest and most tedious one I ever read was Graham Swift’s Tomorrow which was a woman’s monologue about revealing to her children that they were *shock, horror* IVF babies…

        1. I remember reading Tomorrow and agree with you that it was really tedious. It just went on and on covering the same point page after page.

  6. Good commentary. It sounds as if “Trust” is really the trick . . .

    1. It could have been – but one that didn’t interest me

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading