Cover of To Sir with Love, a 1959 novel by E R Braithwaite capturing one man's attempt to change the lives of students in his care and as a result change his own life.

Braithwaite used his own experience as a teacher in London’s East End in his first novel, To Sir With Love, published in 1959.

As a well educated man who’d been ready to die for his country during war, Braithwaite had looked forward to a career in engineering after leaving the RAF. But every interview ended with the same result — rejection.

The problem wasn’t lack of experience or lack of skill; it was his colour. During World War 2, neither his black skin nor the place of his birth (British Guiana) had mattered but in the Britain of the late 1940s, he encountered racial prejudice and bigotry.

He turned to teaching out of necessity, finding an opportunity in a profession badly in need of educated men and women. He’d expected something appropriate to his skills, never expecting a posting in one of the worst schools in the East End of London.

To Sir with Love charts his relationship with the class of 15-year-olds he is expected to teach. This smartly-dressed man with impeccable manners is initially dismayed and shocked at the unruly bunch with their uncouth manners and relaxed attitude to hygiene. It’s fair to say that his initial responsedoesn’t paint him in a good light.

Though he has no experience of education he quickly dismisses the headmaster’s doctrine of disciplined freedom. The head believes that giving the pupils the freedom to work, play and express themselves without fear, is the best way to prepare them for a life beyond school. What Braithwaite sees however is that those in his charge are rude, disrespectful and insolent.

Towards his class he’s haughty and judgemental in his first encounters:

The girl who rose to comply was fair-haired and slim. with a pair of heavy breasts which swung loosely under a thin jumper, evidently innocent of any support. I wondered at the kind of parent who would allow a girl to go out so sloppily dressed.


Braithwaite eventually establishes a close bond with the youngsters in his charge but only when he appreciates that he has to change his approach. Lessons on mathematical concepts and measurement systems are cast aside in favour of practical arithmetic and real-life issues — household budgeting; weighing and measuring food and measuring travel distances. The real breakthrough happens when he decides to treat them as adults in waiting:

Most of you will be leaving school within six months or so … in a short while you will be embarked on the very adult business of earning a living. …When we move out of the state of childhood certain higher standards of conduct are expected.

It’s a risky strategy to tell a group of unruly teenagers to call each other Miss or Sir, brush their clothes, shine their shoes and turn up with clean hands. But surprisingly it works. By the end of the school year,
his students feel as attached to him as they do to him.

If the plot of To Sir with Love sounds familiar, it maybe because you’ve seen the 1967 film adaptation with Sidney Potier in the lead role and the singer Lulu played one of the pupils. Though the film does represent the changing teacher/pupil dynamics really well, there is one significant difference from the book.

Prejudice lies at the heart of E. R Braithwaite’s novel, an element which is largely downplayed in the film, much to the author’s dismay.

In the novel. the teacher earns considerable respect in the community for the way he treats his students, expanding their horizons, and turning them into decent, mature members of society. And yet he is still shunned in the streets and insulted by strangers. He’s made all too aware that he’s not entirely considered “one of them” and one mis-step could easily undo everything he has achieved.

27 responses to “To Sir With Love by E. R. Braithwaite — a lesson taught”

  1. […] “Sir” is a teacher in the East End of London in this novel which reflects Braithwaite’s own experience in the classroom in the late 1950s. Review is here […]

  2. I didn’t realise the movie was even based on a book! I do like Poitier’s movies, particularly those where the story is about prejudice like Guess Who’s Coming for Dinner and Paris Blues.

    1. I’ve not heard of Paris Blues. I do like his films too – the only other one I know is In the Heat of the Night

  3. We read the book at our boo group and found it an excellent read. I remember that quote you picked out about the girl’s state of dress!

    1. So glad to hear this Annabel, I’ve mentioned the book to several people but none of them had realised it existed. They just thought it was a film

  4. I love the book, I read it first in my early 20s I think and then one Christmas Day, alone, with a cold and a veggie lasagne while everyone else had Christmas somewhere else!

    1. That sounds a miserable day other than having something engrossing to read

  5. I love this story and I also loved the film. American film makers had a very tentative approach to including racism at the time the film was made. I was in grade 11 when it came out and of course all of us understood about the racism. I grew up in the middle of Michigan where I spent all my school years and I never saw or spoke to any people of colour until university even though Motown was only 100 miles down the road.

    1. I didn’t know you had lived in Michigan. I used to visit the state regularly when I was working – further north than the place where you lived though

  6. I loved this movie so much, I’ve always been curious about the book. Now I’ll definitely read it. Thanks for the review!

    1. I went for years not knowing it was a book either

  7. such a great film, I didn’t realise it was a memoir, thanks!

    1. I think the book is even better than the film

  8. How is he being haughty and judgmental in his first encounters? When you go to a school you are supposed to dress in an appropriate manner and if kids are not keen to do so then parents must tell them.

    1. It’s the fact that he makes judgements about the pupils and their parents having had very little interaction with them and knowing nothing about their environment.

      1. It’s ages since I read the book so don’t remember the details. I was responding to the passage that you had quoted. He does not come across haughty or judgmental in that. Wearing inners is the proper way to dress to school, it has nothing to do with environment.

  9. I loved the film so much, but have never read the book

    1. It took me decades to get to read the book. Glad I did because I felt it was stronger than the film

  10. I never read the book, but I drew on the lessons of the film when I began my teaching career ten years later. The most respectful thing a teacher can do, for kids from any background, is to prepare them for their future, a future limited only by their own potential, their capacity to work hard and their ability to get on with other people including the ones they don’t like.

    1. Wish I’d had you as a teacher !

  11. Even though I didn’t see the film, I intended to read this book back in the 1960s when it crossed my radar. But somehow I didn’t. How easy is it to get hold of now?

    1. Very easy Margaret – I only bought it a few years ago, published I think by Penguin

  12. How infuriating for Braithwaite that the film ignored his experience of racism, although unsurprising, I suppose.

    1. I remember that the film touched on it but ever so slightly

  13. I didn’t realize the movie was based on a memoir. Adding this to my tbr!

    1. It’s worth reading Carol

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading