Stone Yard Devotional is an impressively polished narrative about despair, forgiveness and hope. At least that’s what I think it’s about but I could be wrong because there were many aspects of Charlotte Wood’s novel I didn’t entirely understand.

The gist of this novel is that the central narrator has abandoned her career and marriage to live at a small religious community near the town where she spent her childhood. This isn’t a closed order nor one that operates a strict code of silence — it’s simply a place offering simple accommodation to people who need to press the pause button on their lives.

This woman is not a believer — to her “belief is as thin as air” — and doesn’t understand the concept of prayer but she comes to appreciate the quiet, steady rhythms of the convent. They give her the opportunity to look back on her life, reflecting on her childhood and the bond she enjoyed with her recently deceased mother. I got the distinct impression the narrator was trying to make sense of her life, to put it in some kind of order.

Her deliberations are disrupted by visitors from the world outside the religious community.

First comes news about a nun who had left the convent to work in Thailand with abused women, and then disappeared. Sister Jenny’s remains have now been found and are to be returned to the order for burial. Escorting the casket across international borders will be another nun, a woman who is well-respected as a fierce campaigner on environmental issues but who doesn’t endear herself to the other nuns. She doesn’t join them for meals, doesn’t help with any of the chores and spends most of her time complaining about lack of Wi-fi.

Helen Parry’s presence is particularly problematic for the narrator, triggering uncomfortable memories of when they were classmates and the narrator was involved in bullying Helen. Wood shows how the nun’s arrival awakens feelings of anxiety (will Helen recognise her after all these years); feelings of remorse and then the hope of forgiveness.

Stone Yard Devotional has a third visitation which is the most gruesome and the most detailed — a plague of mice.

The nuns try to maintain their normal rituals but every day is a battle with these creatures. They’re an inescapable presence “inside the walls, moving, moving, moving”, that burrows in and devours the very structures of the convent. They eat through electrical equipment and plastic, nest in the communal car and raid the food stores. The nuns set traps, emptying them every hour as the infestation grows, but they can’t dig holes deep enough to bury all the bodies.

I’ve grown to hate them. not just the plague but the creatures themselves. At night is loudest, when the other sounds of the world are stilled. No birds, no psalm practice, no miscellaneous noises of an occupied abbey. Only mice feet overhead, pattering across the ceiling and inside the walls, a sound like dried leaves falling.

By the end of the novel I was left with a multitude of unanswered questions.

Are these visitations meant to be allegorical? Is the battle with the mice symbolic of conflict in society perhaps — a kind of nature versus man. Or an infection that can take hold (the novel is set during the Covid pandemic)?

What are we meant to make of the skeletal remains that lie in a casket for many weeks while approval is sought for their burial? Is there meant to be a parallel between this physical act of burying the past and the narrator’s desire to bury her past emotionally through forgiveness?? Or is that stretching a point too far??

Why is there so little background given about the woman whose story we follow? All we learn is that she had a job in the environmental sector. She was heavily involved with multiple causes from threatened species to indigenous literacy, justice, food poverty and climate change and she’s severed connections with all of them. Why? We never get to find out nor do we discover what went wrong the marriage. That lack of context made it more difficult for me to understand why she needed to seek refuge at the convent.

This is a contemplative novel, almost like a journal of the woman’s thoughts and reflections. Many of the chapters in fact begin almost in note form. “Arrive finally at about three’,” is how one starts; in another she notes “Dreamed I had a beautiful pet.” We’re experiencing not a novel as such, more like a series of random thoughts that she wants to capture for herself rather than to share with anyone else. “Nobody will read this but me,” she says at one point while also admitting she is being selective with what she documents.

Stylistically this is a wonderful piece of writing — some of the descriptions about the mice just made me gasp and the flashback sections where she recalls her mother are very moving.. But I never felt fully engaged in the book or in her attempts to answer the big questions about faith, forgiveness and hope. I felt I was observing her dispassionately instead of walking with her hand in hand through those deliberations.


22 responses to “Stone Yard Devotional by Charlotte Wood — a world infected”

  1. It took me awhile to get my head around this book but after reading some reviews I came to more of an understanding.

    1. Perhaps that would help me too

  2. I agree. It is a fine piece of writing and is evocative, but nothing as such that will stay with me long term and all the unanswered questions, as you put it, are a bit frustrating. I often think when judging whether a book is really great – will I want to re-read it in future? This is not the case here. When it comes to this type of contemplative, evocative, character-driven, first person narrations, the book world is competitive and over-saturated. There are, unfortunately, many finer examples that also engage, at least, in my opinion.

    1. Though I didn’t understand much of it I still find myself thinking about the book so it has left a definite impression on me

  3. This is the Booker shortlist book that most appeals to me, partly because of the mice. There was a real plague of mice in Australia during the pandemic, so that may just be the author imagining what that would be like if you were stuck somewhere you couldn’t escape.

    1. I never knew there had actually been a plague. I kept shuddering at some of the episodes yet the nuns were nowhere near as panicked I would have been.

      1. Mice plagues are a regular occurrence in rural Australia, so I’m not sure I want to read about one…I’ve lived through too many!

  4. The mice parts of this story were anxiety-inducing but the rest, (and I just checked the exact words I used in my review) – deeply satisfying. I enjoyed the both the subtleties and complexities in the story, particularly the way Wood explored grief.

    I’m crossing #ALLTHETHINGS for Wood to win the Booker.

    1. I think I need to re-read the book because I’m sure I missed out a lot of the subtleties

  5. I enjoyed the ambiguity of this one and it is currently my frontrunner for the Booker. I had the same questions as you but was happy to go on the journey with Wood. To my mind it was a novel about grief.

    1. It was an intriguing novel and I just kept wanting to read more and more of it even though I had this nagging feeling I wasn’t “getting” it.

  6. I tended to feel much as you do as I read the book, and while I found it enjoyable and thought provoking, only a few weeks later I find it hasn’t stayed with me at all. Which is not a stunning accolade and not what I expected.

    1. I think it will stay with me because of the atmosphere she create but it didn’t have as much of a profound impact as I might have expected

  7. Charlotte Wood has made a point of saying she doesn’t want to spell everything out, that reading is just as much a creative act as writing a novel is and so she wants the reader to fill in the gaps and to bring their own interpretation and meaning to her words. I have read all her novels and I can’t say this is typical of her style, but I suspect you have to be in the right mood to read it.

    1. I’m OK with books where there are gaps – I don’t feel I need to have everything spelled out. So the gaps in my understanding of the significance of the visitations wasn’t an issue really. The gaps in her back story were the real issue

  8. I just checked my post on this, and also read it as about guilt, forgiveness and hope of redemption. I found it quietly but deeply moving.

    1. Oh good, that shows I at least understood some of the book.

  9. Liliane Ruyters Avatar
    Liliane Ruyters

    You worded my doubts about the novel perfectly. Thank you!

    1. I did enjoy it and I did appreciate the quality of her writing. I just felt there was something going on I didn’t understand

  10. I don’t know if it will clarify anything for you, but my review is here, and (depending on how much time you want to invest in a book that didn’t really work for you) it has links to other reviews and an interview with the author:
    https://anzlitlovers.com/2023/11/03/stone-yard-devotional-2023-by-charlotte-wood/

    1. As always Lisa, your review has so much depth of understanding. Like you I didn’t feel this was a novel of despair but more one of a reconciliation with the past and with her feelings over her mother’s death

      1. Yes, I had a sense of coming to terms with things, which is a blessing when we achieve it.

We're all friends here. Come and join the conversation

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading