Armchair BEA: On Literary Fiction

BEAIf there are two words guaranteed to divide the world of authors, publishers and academics, they would be Literary Fiction.

The orthodox view is that literary fiction is the very highest level of artistic merit; the kind of writing that all authors really aspire to achieve. It’s meant to distinguish the truly great from the mere readable or popular kinds of books (remember the fuss over the Booker Prize in 2011 when the judges said they based their selection on readability).

Some critics in North America set the feathers flying a few years ago by daring to suggest that the idea of literary fiction had run its course, that it had become just another genre, like humour, crime or adventure. Not so said the New York Review of Books last year – it was time that literary fiction be recognised as a genre of its own said editor Sue Halpern.

What is ‘literary fiction’? Generally it’s taken to denote a serious-minded novel of high artistic integrity in which style is more important than the actual content (maybe Will Self’s Umbrella falls into that category?); slow and thoughtful in pace allowing the characters’ inner lives and motivations become the focus. To many people that just means ‘highbrow’, maybe even ‘pretentious’ or ‘difficult’ and  ‘unreadable’. But for others it means the kind of book that makes it to the short list for the Booker Prize or the work of authors who win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

Who are these shining lights? Contemporary candidates from the West could include Michael Ondaatje, Iris Murdoch or Barry Unsworth plus many of the Booker prize winners. They’re all formidable writers and superb storytellers.

banvilleAs of this week I am going to add another name to the list: John Banville, winner of the 2005 Booker Prize with The Sea. It’s a wonderfully lyrical narrative about a widower who returns to the location of his childhood holidays where one summer, many many years earlier  something happened ( we don’t get to find out until about 10 pages from the end). It’s so good that the minute I finished it, I wanted to start all over again.

BookerTalk

What do you need to know about me? 1. I'm from Wales which is one of the countries in the UK and must never be confused with England. 2. My life has always revolved around the written and spoken word. I worked as a journalist for nine years then in international corporate communications 3. My tastes in books are eclectic. I love realism and hate science fiction and science fantasy. 4. I am trying to broaden my reading horizons geographically by reading more books in translation

13 thoughts on “Armchair BEA: On Literary Fiction

  • Pingback: Armchair BEA: Curtain Down | BookerTalk

  • May 31, 2013 at 12:07 am
    Permalink

    This is a really great post. I love the way you explained it and great author examples. Enjoy the rest of Armcharm BEA!

    Reply
  • May 30, 2013 at 11:39 pm
    Permalink

    Wonderful post. It really brings clarity to the term and gives some recent history about the term’s controversy.

    Reply
    • May 31, 2013 at 6:53 am
      Permalink

      Thank you. You know you are fast becoming my most loyal follower!

      Reply
    • May 31, 2013 at 10:43 pm
      Permalink

      i was surprised at how much people get steamed up about this issue

      Reply
  • May 30, 2013 at 11:00 pm
    Permalink

    I agree that literary fiction is what we tend to think of as the award winners. Interesting. I’ve never heard of this book you mention. I will keep a lookout!

    Reply
  • May 30, 2013 at 10:32 pm
    Permalink

    Great post, really informative! I’m going to try an check out some of the authors you mentioned!

    Reply
  • May 30, 2013 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    Thanks for clarifying what literary fiction is. Great post.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to ablightedone Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: