The Cat’s Table – Michael Ondaatje

Initially The Cat’s Table by Michael Ondaatje struck me as a rather bland story populated with a host of rather improbable characters and told in a very episodic manner.  As it developed, the book took on the characteristics of a Bildungsroman in which a physical journey to a new life  (in this case an ocean voyage) acted as an extended metaphor for the passage from childhood to the beginnings of adolescence.  And then approximately half way through, it underwent a completely unexpected change of approach and became far more reflective and enigmatic.

catAt the start of the novel we meet eleven-year-old Michael who is put on a ship in Colombo to travel to England where he is to be re-united with the mother he last saw four years earlier. During the three-week voyage on the cruise ship ‘Oransay’, he makes friends with two boys — Cassius and Ramadhin — who are similarly travelling to new boarding schools in England. Wary of each other at first, the boys find common ground in their insatiable curiosity about the activities of the Oransay and their  fellow passengers.

And they do have some extraordinary assortment of travelling companions. Ondatjee populates his novel with amongst others, a Ceylonese circus troupe, a reclusive multi millionaire who lies in his stateroom dying from rabies (the boys believe his illness is the result of a curse); a mysterious woman who is prone to throwing novels overboard and a man who tends a secret garden of medicinal and deadly plants deep in the ship’s bowels. For added interest, they discover a prisoner who is taken onto the decks at night in shackles.

Most of the first half of the book is taken up with the boy’s escapades as they explore, snoop and eavesdrop.  “We were learning about adults simply by being in their midst, ” says Michael the narrator. But misunderstand much of what they see and fail to comprehend some of the signals and  it’s left to the adult reader to fill in the gaps.

Around about page 180, this episodic, fragmentary narrative changes direction as the narrator (the adult Michael) leaps forwards many years to relate what happened to the boys once in England. Even then, this is not a linear story as Michael flips from an episode on the boat to a moment in his later life when he was able to understand the significance of that episode more clearly. He reflects also on some of the people he encountered on the ship and how later life revealed what was hidden from him during the voyage. Even then, the novel ends with many questions unanswered. Was the mysterious novel reader, really an undercover intelligence agent? Did the prisoner really escape? What is the nature of the relationship between Michael and his cousin Emily who was also travelling on the boat.?  The answers are never revealed. Ondatjee simply suggests and leaves the reader to draw their own conclusions. I’m still puzzling about one of the very last pieces of dialogue in which, having met up with Edith after decades of silence, she tells him. ‘You cannot love me into safety.’

There is no big drama or turning point in this novel. Its impact comes from the lyrical quality of Ondatjee’s writing and the enigma which which he ends. It’s not as redolent with atmosphere or meaning as his Booker Prize winning novel The English Patient but its more quiet style nevertheless makes a lasting impression.

Note: I corrected the name of his cousin after an astute reader spotted I’d put Edith, not Emily.

About BookerTalk

What do you need to know about me? 1. I'm from Wales which is one of the countries in the UK and must never be confused with England. 2. My life has always revolved around the written and spoken word. I worked as a journalist for nine years then in international corporate communications 3. My tastes in books are eclectic. I love realism and hate science fiction and science fantasy. 4. I am trying to broaden my reading horizons geographically by reading more books in translation

Posted on December 15, 2012, in Book Reviews and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. The name of michaels Cousin is Emily, or am I wrong?

    Like

  2. I also liked the 2nd part of Cat’s Table better. I wrote a review of it here http://www.thecuecard.com/node/695

    Like

    • Hi swright9, I just read your review at the Cue Card and see that we had very much the same experience with this book. Like you I feel the book lingers in the memory. Karen Heenan-Davies

      ________________________________

      Like

  3. Yours is a far more considered review than I managed Barbara. Agree with you about the way Ondaatje sprinkles in the clues early on but the boys certainly miss them and so did I in many cases. It is a book that lingers. It was the book for our book club and had very mixed reviews. Some thought the first half was the best where I thought the exact opposite.

    Like

  4. Nice review. I read this book a while ago and was both mesmerized and haunted for a while by the mysteries in it. Just reread my review and can’t quite remember it all. My own review/reaction was way too long but here it is if it adds anything to your reading. I think I began wondering about the possibilities of what was prevented: http://www.wellwell2.com/search/label/Michael%20Ondaatje

    Like

  1. Pingback: I’ve started so I’ll finish | BookerTalk

  2. Pingback: Sunday Salon: A new bookish adventure « BookerTalk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: